John Hendow

During my junior year of high school (1980), I heard the Dead Kennedys debut album “Fresh Fruit For Rotting Vegetables” at a rocking party. I had heard other punk bands and was a fan of Black Flag, the Clash, the Misfits, the Sex Pistols and the Ramones, but something about the DKs particularly resonated with me. The music was energetic and full of attitude, with a helping of snarling satire courtesy of Jello Biafra’s lyrics. It was the first point in my young adult life that I recognized the editorial voice present in rebellious music, which led me to explore some of the historical politically-charged recordings of Woody Guthrie. At the time in my life when I was on the cusp of adulthood, the status quo seemed boring and artificial. The DKs deftly skewered America’s middle class conservatism, and smarmy lyrics aside, it acted as a great soundtrack for my final summer as a high school student.

read more…

My only pet is a domestic reptile. Basil is a Colombian Rainbow Boa (Epicrates cenchria maurus). Like most adult Colombian Rainbow Boas, Basil is medium in size (about 6 feet), and brown in color with circles and spots. His smooth scales are iridescent and refract light into beautiful colors like a fish lure. As snakes go, this boa is even tempered and easy to care for. They like humidity and are good climbers. Basil spends a lot of time either coiled up in his water bowl or scaling the bamboo branches inside his hutch. I also let him swim in the bathtub once in a while, much to the alarm of unsuspecting house guests.

Colombian Rainbow Boas are oviviparous, so the eggs hatch inside the female. I witnessed his first feeding at the breeder’s store shortly after he was born in 1994, and took him home about two weeks later. He’s a permanent guest of honor in our Tiki Lounge.

Last night’s Preons show at The High Dive went fairly well. Originally there were going to be three bands on the bill:

• Monostereo
• Mercurius
• The Preons

At about 8:00 we were informed “Monostereo” had dropped off the bill, so we adjusted the set times a bit. Ultimately this meant pushing back our start time by 30 minutes. The guys in “Mercurius” were cool and fun to chat with. I always enjoy meeting musicians who play for all the right reasons. These guys had taken the ferry from Bremerton on a Wednesday night, just to play in Seattle. That is a refreshingly unjaded attitude.

read more…

I’ll never be the official GOD OF THUNDER as that position will be eternally occupied by KISS bassist Gene Simmons.  However, I’m fairly pleased with the low-end mayhem that I occasionally wield. Last night at Preons rehearsal during one song I turned on the “ultrabass” feature on my amp, which generates a note an octave below the one being played. It was a fairly satisfying addition to the bass line in that song and added a new dimension of intensity to that part. Our guitarist noticed it right away with approval.

Read the rest of this posting for more.

read more…

I recently upgraded the wireless segment in our house from 802.11g to 802.11n (draft). The “n” standard is still not finalized, with the official specification expected some time in the next 18 months. Fortunately the current draft has been accepted as a core functional set, so the final version will extend it without rendering draft devices obsolete.

Even with all this swirl, I can’t resist being on the cutting edge of some of these things… so I replaced the old wireless router with a new one. Right away I can tell the overall signal is stronger and has improved coverage. Even throttled to 54 Mbit, it’s delivering a better wireless experience than the old router. It also has a number of improved security features, prioritization management for network traffic, and best of all… a blue LED. You gotta have a blue LED.

Most people probably have an innate understanding of what it means to be “in tune”. Generally we define this as the state in which a musical sound seems to match or harmoniously complement another musical sound. In Western musical theory (that is, the music of the western hemisphere, not “western music”) we have a well-established set of fixed musical notes with 12 chromatic notes per octave. The notes on a piano or a fretted instrument such as guitar are (1) fixed quantized values assigned to a key or fret position and (2) compose a set that is consistent within and across these instruments, so if you play middle C on a piano and middle C on a guitar they will be the same pitch and therefore the same note.

So, are the notes on these instruments in tune? The answer is yes. And no.

This post is long, and is a core part of the music theory postings on this site. Read on for details.

Vibrations and Measurement
In the most basic physical sense, all sound results from an object that is in motion. For example, when you pluck the string on guitar, it begins to vibrate. This causes the air in the room to vibrate and our ears detect this vibration, relaying a message to the brain that sound is being heard. The brain perceives physical waveform characteristics of the vibrations such as pitch, loudness, and timbre. The guitar string’s vibration continues, decaying over time until it can no longer be heard.

One commonly used term to describe musical sound is pitch, meaning “how high or how low” a note sounds. The relative highness or lowness is our interpretation of the number of times an object is vibrating during a period of time. We use the physics unit “Hertz” (or Hz) to describe the number of vibratory cycles per second. A higher pitched musical sound has more vibrations per second than a lower one. The human ear detects vibrations from about 15 Hz to 16 KHz, giving us a range of human-detectible pitches to use in music. One of the common tuning standards for pianos, guitars, and symphonies is the pitch 440 Hz. This pitch corresponds to the note “A”, and is commonly referred to as “A440″.  It is worth noting that the A440 standard is not universal; this happens to be the most common tuning standard but there are notable variations in the symphonic world, generally varying by less than 5 Hz. For the sake of simplicity, we will confine our discussion to the A440 tuning standard.

The Mathematics of Harmony
Music consists of pitches (notes), played one after the other. In simple early forms of music, only one pitch is used at a time, even though more than one voice or instrument may be sounding that pitch simultaneously (musicologists call this “homophony”). When a second pitch (“harmony”) is used at the same time, our brain interprets the results of the combination of these two pitches. Some two-note harmonies are considered pleasing (consonant) and others are considered less pleasing (dissonant). Most people find certain precise combinations as particularly pleasing, and there is a mathematical principle behind this.

You were probably introduced to Pythagoras (580 BCE – 505 BCE) at some point in your education. He was the Greek scholar most famous for the Pythagorean Theorem which states that the sum of the squares of the two legs of a right triangle is equal to the square of the hypotenuse. Pythagoras believed that the fundamentally simple principles of geometry and musical harmony could explain the fabric of the universe. According to legend, his musical discovery first occurred when he heard the sound of four blacksmith’s hammers striking anvils. Certain pairs of the hammers sounded consonant and other pairs dissonant:

• A + B = consonant
• A + C = consonant
• A + D = the same note
• B + C = dissonant

To understand further, Pythagoras weighed the hammers. Each weighed a number of “units” (some say that Pythagoras used the standard pound for this, but it is irrelevant which unit of measure is used as long as it is constant).  He determined that their relative weights could be expressed as follows:

• A weighed 12 units
• B weighed 9 unit
• C weighed 8 units
• D weighed 6 units

When two hammers were struck at the same time, their relative weights could be expressed as a ratio:

• A + B = 12:9 (or 4:3)
• A + C = 12:8 (or 3:2)
• A + D = 12:6 (or 2:1)
• B + C = 9:8

Based on the ratios of the mass of these hammers, he discovered a series of mathematical relationships between musically harmonious note intervals. His subsequent experiments were conducted using a simple instrument called themonochord. The monochord consists of a single string stretched between two stationary supporting endpoints, with a movable bridge in the middle, dividing the string into two segments. If the bridge is in the exact center of the string length, the two segments will be exactly the same length with a ratio of 1:1, and therefore the same pitch will sound. If the bridge is moved, the two segments will have different lengths, and therefore different pitches. Pythagoras discovered that certain ratios of string lengths would result in pitch combinations that were especially consonant.

• 1:1 Unison
• 2:1 Octave
• 3:2 Perfect Fifth

If you hear these Pythagorean harmonies, you will almost certainly agree that they are very much in tune and sound pleasing. The Pythagorean-tuned perfect fifth is richly consonant, so we assume it must be in tune. Using just these three simple harmonic ratios, we can explore the Pythagorean scale, beginning at A440 and ending at the note one octave above it. We’ll use the ratio of the Perfect Fifth (3:2), moving around of the circle of fifths to fill out the notes of our scale until we arrive back at the note A again. There are 12 notes in the chromatic scale, so this will require 12 repetitions of the 3:2 ratio, each continuing from the previous note.

• We identify our starting pitch as A440. By definition, the octave note A’ will have a 2:1 ratio to the starting note A.
• Expressing this octave relationship mathematically, we have (440 Hz *2) = 880 Hz.
• This defines the frequency range of our octave. We know that all our notes will fall in between 440 Hz and 880 Hz.
• Each n step around the circle of fifths results in a frequency f whose formula can be mathematically described as
  f = (((3:2)^n) x 440 Hz),  and we can apply the 2:1 octave rule when necessary to keep our resultant frequency f within our 440 Hz < f < 880 Hz spectrum.

With these rules we will begin building a table of pitches for our Pythagorean scale.

So far so good. Let’s go ahead and add our next note, the perfect fifth. The note E is a perfect fifth above A, with a pitch ratio of 3:2 from our starting note A440
Here is the mathematical formula for computing the value: (440 Hz*3)/2 = 660 Hz

We’ll continue by adding our next note. The note B is a Perfect Fifth above E, with a ratio of 3:2 above its frequency.
Math: (660 Hz*3)/2=990 Hz
This is above 880 Hz, our highest frequency in the octave. We want to get a B note in the same octave range as the original A note, so the frequency should fall between 440 Hz and 880 Hz. Remember that all octaves have a 2:1 ratio, so our B note at 990 Hz can be divided by 2 to get 495 Hz, the same pitch, but one octave lower.
Our ratio from the starting A440 note is ((3:2)^2)/2 or 9:8

The note F# is a Perfect Fifth above B, with a ratio of 3:2 above its frequency.
Math: (495 Hz *3)/2 = 742.5 Hz
The ratio from the starting A440 note is (3:2)^5 or 27:16

The note C# is a Perfect Fifth above F#, with a ratio of 3:2 above it.
Math: (742.5 Hz*3)/2 = 1113.75 Hz
To keep this note in the same octave we divide by 2, which gives us 556.875 Hz
The ratio from the starting A440 note is now (3:2) ^4 or 81:64

The note G# is a Perfect Fifth above C#, with a ratio of 3:2 above it.
Math: (556.875 Hz*3)/2 = 835.3125 Hz
The ratio from our starting A440 note is now (3:2)^5 or 243:128

The note D# is a Perfect Fifth above G#, with a ratio of 3:2 above it.
Math: (835.3125 Hz*3)/2 = 1252.96875 Hz
Divide by 2 to get 626.484375 Hz
The ratio from our starting A440 note is now (3:2)^6 or 729:512

At this point we have the diatonic notes (those notes considered as members of the normal set) for the A Major scale. It looks like we’re on track here. But let’s continue with our exercise. Remember that there are 12 chromatic pitches in Western music theory. Starting with the last note we added (D#), let’s continue with computing the rest of the chromatic notes.

The note A# is a Perfect Fifth above D#, with a ratio of 3:2 above it.
Math: (626.484375 Hz*3)/2 = 939.7265625 Hz
Divide by 2 to get 469.86328125 Hz
The ratio from our starting A440 note is now (3:2)^7 or 2187:2048

The note E# is a Perfect Fifth above A#, with a ratio of 3:2 above it.
Math: (469.86328125 Hz*3)/2 = 704.794921875 Hz.
Divide by 2 to get 352.3974609375 Hz
The ratio from our starting A440 note is now (3:2)^8 or 6561:8192.

The note B# is a Perfect Fifth above E#, with a ratio of 3:2 above it.
Math: (352.3974609375 Hz*3)/2 = 528.59619140625 Hz.
The ratio from our starting A440 note is now (3:2)^9 or 19683:16384.

The note F## (F double sharp is enharmonic with G) is a Perfect Fifth above B#, with a ratio of 3:2 above it.
Math: (528.59619140625 Hz*3)/2 = 792.894287109375 Hz.
Divide by 2 to get 396.447143554687 Hz
The ratio from our starting A440 note is now (3:2)^10 or 59049:32768.

The note C## (C double sharp is enharmonic with D) is a Perfect Fifth above F##, with a ratio of 3:2 above it.
Math: (792.894287109375 Hz*3)/2 = 594.670715332031 Hz.
The ratio from our starting A440 note is now (3:2)^11 or 177147:131072.

Let’s add the last note to our chromatic scale.
The note G## (G double sharp is enharmonic with A) is a Perfect Fifth above C##, with a ratio of 3:2 above it.
Math: (594.670715332031 Hz*3)/2 = 892.006072998046 Hz.
The ratio from our starting A440 note is now (3:2)^12 or 1062882:524288.

So, here we are at the end of all that math, and there seems to be a bit of a problem. G## is enharmonic with the note A, so we expect G## to be the same frequency as A’. As you can see from the chart, these frequencies are not the same. The math is right… we’ve gone all the way around the chromatic scale using the 3:2 ratio provided by Pythagoras, but the octave note is not what we expected.

Why Are These Frequencies Different?
The ratio of G## to our starting A440 is 1062882:524288. This is slightly larger than 2:1 and our octave note has a discrepancy of over 12 Hz from what we expected. This discrepancy is called “Pythagorean Comma”. The notes in the Pythagorean scale sound very much purely in tune, especially when building diatonic chords in the key upon which the scale is based (in this case, the key of A). This scale yields acoustically perfect fifths that are musically satisfying, but it is important to note that the whole tone interval (for instance from A to B) is not equal to the sum of two semitones (A to A# to B). The problem with this approach is that you need to recompute (and thus retune) the intervals for each key based on the starting note. If you happen to be playing a piano that has been tuned to the Pythagorean scale, it sounds beautifully in tune for only one key.  If you change keys, the entire instrument needs to be retuned in reference to your new key center.

During the early Renaissance, composers began to modulate (change tonal centers) to different keys during a composition. Pythagorean tuning produced unacceptable dissonance in these other keys. To alleviate this problem, some alternate tuning systems were devised. One tuning system, the mean tone tuning, made the fifth slightly flat in order to provide acoustically perfect thirds. However, it still suffered from a discrepancy between adjacent semitones. Four of the chromatic keys were closer to perfect acoustic tuning than the other eight. As one modulated key centers successively, the semitone tuning discrepancy became gratingly dissonant.

Equal Temperament
The eventual solution to the tuning standard was to create a system in which

• Octaves observe the 2:1 ratio and are acoustically in tune
• All other intervals are acoustically slightly out of tune (tempered), by an amount that is small enough to be considered musically acceptable

With twelve even ratios per octave, we can find the ratio of adjacent tones using the formula:

• r^12 = 2
  or
• r=twelfth root of two
  or
• r=2^(1/12)

Equal temperament divides the octave into 12 equal semitones, using a constant ratio for adjacent semitones. The tuning system was embraced by Bach, most notably in his Well-Tempered Clavier, which comprises 24 preludes and fugues for keyboard (one in each of the 12 chromatic major and minor keys). In order to perform these compositions, the keyboard instrument must be equally tempered to avoid tuning dissonance in most keys. It is interesting to note that equally tempered Spanish guitars were in use before the year 1500, which predates theWell-Tempered Clavier.

So Are We In Tune?
The difficulty in answering this question has a lot to do with our perception of tuning. In the purest acoustic sense, we accept a tolerable magnitude of tuning error in order to allow all musical keys to equally consonant. This is especially true for “fixed” tuning instruments such as piano or fretted guitar.

On some musical instruments it is possible to make small adjustments to notes in order to perfectly tune intervals. These instruments include:

• Fretless bass
• Classical strings (violin etc.)
• Trombone
• Trumpet (using valve slides)

The Impact of Temperament on Getting Guitars in Tune
With frets to help quantize pitches, it should be less problematic to tune guitars or basses. Ironically, many guitarists and bassists learn a seemingly handy means of tuning their instruments using harmonics on adjacent strings. Since these instruments are tuned with (most) pairs adjacent strings having the relationship of a perfect fourth, if one sounds the fifth fret harmonic on the lower string and theseventh fret harmonic on the upper string, these notes appear to be sounding in unison. However, remember that:

• The guitar’s frets are placed in accordance with the equal temperament scale
• Harmonics belong to the Pythagorean scale of perfect ratios
• The fifth fret harmonic is producing a note whose ratio above the fundamental is 4:1 (two octaves). This note belongs to both the equal temperament scale and the Pythagorean scale. By definition this note is in tune with both systems.
• The seventh fret harmonic produces a note whose relationship to the open string is exactly 3:2. This ratio belongs to the Pythagorean scale but not to the equal temperament scale.

Therefore this tuning method will very nearly tune the instrument, but introduces an error whose magnitude is equal to the Pythagorean comma. Granted, this is a very small discrepency that can only be detected by a very sensitive ear. But it’s not in tune, and the tuning error should not be overlooked.

The most reliable means of tuning instruments is to use a “strobe tuner” or other electronic tuner. This ensures that the base intervals are equally tempered, with further “musical tuning” adjustments made during performance at the discretion of the performer.

In the musical landscape, electric guitar is my home town although I occasionally stray across the tracks. I currently play in a couple of bands, each of which is in a different style. My favorite current project is The Preons, which I joined a few months ago as their bassist, auditioning at the suggestion of a co-worker who plays trumpet and keyboards. It’s a great experience to play with a good musician like him, and it challenges me to write music in a new style. The band tends to write music in the “Indie Pop” genre, incorporating some interesting and unexpected harmonic structures in songs. It keeps me on my toes as a musician since I need to compose bass lines against unusual chord changes. This is also an opportunity to develop some of my song fragments that always wind up sitting on the hard drive at home.

We have a gig on Wednesday 5/23 at The High Dive in Seattle. We’re first on the bill and will be starting at 9:00 PM. With some luck (and few rehearsals) we might be ready to debut a few new songs at this show. I’ll definitely be playing some songs with the Warwick Corvette, and perhaps experimenting with some new effects as well.

Entirely due to random circumstances, I wound up attending Edward Scissorhands last night at the 5th Avenue Theater in Seattle. The theater is a fabulous venue and I’ve enjoyed many performances there. However, I’ll come right out and say that last night’s show was disappointing on many levels. The story arc of the movie does not lend itself to conveyance via modern ballet. The costumes were fine, with interesting and at times powerful staging. But the strongest elements from the movie are:

1. Danny Elfman’s soundtrack
2. Tim Burton’s creative vision
3. Johnny Depp

Subtract them, and all that is left is the not-terribly interesting central plot line that is delivered through interpretive dance. An extended shindig sequence, ostensibly added to give the cast a chance to boogie, was pointless.

I suppose the bigger question in all this is “what is the point of extracting the weakest element of this movie, and then not bothering to include dialog? If this were couched as experimental theater, audiences (and Scissorheads) might have a different mindset going into it. The regular theater patrons and gothlings in attendance all seemed to feel dissatisfied with the production. Overall, I’d give it a “meh”.

I’m a pretty serious coffee geek. In the past few years I’ve learned a lot more about coffee than ever before, and there is still much to learn before a coffee Jedi am I. One of the side effects of being in this geeky crowd is that you may find yourself in the middle of a debate about the correct technique for tamping your espresso shot. Once you’ve gotten your coffee perfectly ground, and dosed into the portafilter, it has to be tamped before the shot can be pulled. The accepted standard for tamping coffee in a 58mm portafilter involves the application of 30 pounds of pressure, using a flat-bottomed stainless steel tamper.

You could go all crazy and get a tamper that has an exotic wood handle or even a built-in force gauge for making sure your barista powers are perfectly calibrated. But I’m pretty fond of the standard stainless steel model, and am learning to consistently deliver a uniform pressure to the grounds. Half the fun of coffee is the ritual…

Eight weeks ago I began a fitness / nutrition program called Kinetix. The founders of the program designed it as a lifestyle enhancement system, and it has been a good experience. Three days each week I’ve been lifting weights with a personal trainer, and four days a week I do cardio exercise. They also emphasize a healthy diet, which hasn’t required much of an adjustment. I tend to eat pretty lean food, usually salads and fish, with the occasional buffalo burger or something. The biggest single adjustment has been eating breakfast which I usually skip. Getting a little fuel in the morning has been a good change.

Although I have always been in reasonably healthy condition, I am not an athlete. In high school and college when all my buddies were playing sports, I was playing guitar. So I haven’t spent a lot of time in the gym or weight room. In fact, I don’t even enjoy sports. I recently began to throw a softball around for fun. That doesn’t make me an athlete by any stretch. My recent years of studying karate were good for general toning up, but it’s not the same as a focused program designed for strength and endurance. After eight weeks of this program I’d say I’m probably approaching the best physical condition of my life.

read more…